Is it fascism?

The concept of 14 characteristics of fascism is most commonly associated with writer Lawrence W. Britt, who articulated a set of recurring traits he observed across several authoritarian regimes commonly described as fascist.*

These characteristics are widely cited in public and political discourse as a descriptive framework for identifying fascist tendencies in governments and movements, though they are not universally accepted as a definitive scholarly definition.

 Lawrence Britt’s 14 Characteristics of Fascism:

  • Powerful and Continuing Nationalism – Constant use of patriotic symbols, slogans, and flags.
  • Disdain for Human Rights – Torture, executions, and imprisonment justified in the name of security.
  • Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats – Unifying the population against perceived internal or external threats.
  • Supremacy of the Military – Disproportionate military spending and glorification of soldiers.
  • Rampant Sexism – Male-dominated power structures and rigid gender roles.
  • Controlled Mass Media – Direct or indirect censorship and intimidation of journalists.
  • Obsession with National Security – Fear used as a tool to mobilize public opinion.
  • Religion and Government Intertwined – Use of religious language and symbolism to legitimize state power.
  • Corporate Power Protected – Close relationships between government and business elites.
  • Labor Power Suppressed – Independent labor unions eliminated or tightly controlled.
  • Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts – Hostility toward academia and cultural expression.
  • Obsession with Crime and Punishment – Expanded police power and erosion of civil liberties.
  • Rampant Cronyism and Corruption – Governance by loyalists and enrichment of elites.
  • Fraudulent or Manipulated Elections – Legal, media, or coercive means used to undermine democratic outcomes.

An alternative and more academically influential framework comes from Umberto Eco, who outlined 14 characteristics of “Ur-Fascism” in his 1995 essay of the same name.

While Britt’s framework is descriptive and policy-focused, Eco’s is psychological and ideological, aimed at identifying the cultural mindset that enables fascism. Both are best used as analytical tools rather than rigid definitions.

Eco’s characteristics include:

  • Cult of tradition
  • Rejection of modernism
  • Cult of action for action’s sake
  • Disagreement seen as treason
  • Fear of difference
  • Appeal to a frustrated middle class
  • Obsession with conspiracy
  • Enemies portrayed as both strong and weak
  • Pacifism framed as betrayal
  • Contempt for the weak
  • Education oriented toward heroism and martyrdom
  • Machismo and the cult of weapons
  • Selective populism
  • Newspeak (impoverished language used to limit critical thought)

*Britt is an American writer and commentator, not a political scientist, and his list became famous in his essay, which was not a  peer-reviewed academic research paper. Some regimes he referenced (such as Suharto’s Indonesia or Pinochet’s Chile) are more commonly classified by scholars as right-wing authoritarian or military dictatorships rather than classical fascist states, but they’re not exactly great company either.